Background
Montgomery Parks recognizes the desire for dog park facilities in the County, particularly in higher-density areas of the County, where residents are less likely to have a yard.
Resident input, staff research, park and recreation industry trends, and the Parks, Recreation, and Open Space (PROS) Plan has strongly indicated a growing desire for dog facilities in the park system.
The Dog Parks Site Suitability (DPSS) Study (accessible pdf) will be used as a reference tool for future park design and development projects. It may also help identify locations for temporary pop-up dog park events such as the “Yappy Hour” at Elm Street Park.
This is a suitability study to investigate possible options for future dog parks. Sites identified in this study do not guarantee the construction of a future dog park facility, nor limit the possibility of a dog park facility at other parks in the County.
Please note, a major tenet of the Montgomery Parks mission is to steward parks natural and historic resources and “… balance demand for recreation with the need for conservation”. Likewise, we are bound by the Environmental Guidelines and cannot build new dog parks in environmentally sensitive areas, such as stream buffers, floodplains, and forested areas.
Purpose
The study will:
- help guide the location design and development of future dog parks in high-density areas of the County;
- serve as a reference tool for pop-up event planning; and
- outline several different types of dog facilities that may be suitable for various locations.
Methodology
- The DPSS Study first defined the Study Area as a half-mile radius from areas zoned for townhouses and/or multi-family homes.
- Parks within the half-mile Study Area were inventoried for their existing facilities, cultural resources, natural resources (such as stream buffers or floodplains), and other relevant factors.
- The parks within the Study Area were then scored according to the following criteria:
- Size: Adequate space available for the facility (approximately 10,000 square feet)
- Playground Proximity: Adequate distance from playgrounds to minimize conflicts
- Residence Proximity: Adequate distance from homes to minimize noise transfer
- Access: Walkable access and available parking if needed, depending on the location
- Safety: Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles and strategies (ex. lighting and visibility)
The highest scoring parks were then evaluated by Park Management and Operations staff in each Park Management region using their day-to-day knowledge of park maintenance and operations to determine the feasibility of each candidate site.
The next step is to solicit public input on these highest scoring parks. Once the review is complete, the Study will provide a list of preferred sites for future implementation by the Park Development Division as facility planning opportunities arise.
Public Input
Locations suggested by this study do not limit the possibility of a dog park facility at other parks in the County. Ideas and comments from the public are welcomed throughout the study process. Visit Montgomery Parks Open Town Hall webpage to review the parks in each Regional Services Center area:
Regional Services Center Areas
Regional Services Center Mid-County
- Existing: Olney Manor Recreational Park
- Existing: Wheaton Regional Park
- Candidate Location: General Getty Local Park
- Candidate Location: Layhill Village Local Park
- Candidate Location: Northwest Branch Recreational Park
- Candidate Location: North Gate Local Park
Regional Services Center East-County
- Candidate Location: Cross Creek Club Local Park
- Candidate Location: Calverton-Galway Local Park
- Candidate Location: Fairland Recreational Park
- Candidate Location: McKnew Local Park
- Candidate Location: MLK, Jr. Recreational Park
- Candidate Location: Stonehedge Local Park
- Candidate Location: Tanglewood Neighborhood Park
Regional Services Center Up-County
- Existing: Black Hill Regional Park
- Existing: Ridge Road Recreational Park
- Candidate Location: Flower Hill Local Park
- Candidate Location: Gunners’s Branch Local Park
- Candidate Location: Hoyles Village Local Park
- Candidate Location: Johnson Local Park
- Candidate Location: Kingsview Local Parks
- Candidate Location: Ovid Hazen Wells Recreational Park
- Candidate Location: Piedmont Crossing Local Park
- Candidate Location: Seneca Crossing Local Park
- Candidate Location: South Germantown Recreational Park
- Candidate Location: Washingotn Square Local Park
- Candidate Location: Waters Landing Local Park
Regional Services Center Silver Spring
- Existing: Ellsworth Urban Park
- Candidate Location: Indian Spring Terrace Local Park
- Candidate Location: Jessup Blair Local Park
- Candidate Location: Long Branch-Arliss Neighborhood Park
- Candidate Location: Nolte Local Park
- Candidate Location: Rosemary Hills-Lyttonsville Local Park
- Candidate Location: South Four Corners
Regional Services Center Bethesda- Chevy Chase
- Existing: Cabin John Regional Park
- Candidate Location: Elm Street Urban Park
- Candidate Location: Fleming Local Park
- Candidate Location: North Chevy Chase
- Candidate Location: Norwood Local Park
- Candidate Location: Timberlawn Local Park
- Candidate Location: Wall Local Park
- Candidate Location: Willard Ave Neighborhood Park
Contact Us
As noted above, locations identified in this study do not preclude the possibility of a dog park facility at other parks in the County. Ideas and comments from the public are welcome throughout the process. The public is welcome to:
- Check this web page for additional updates as the study progresses.
- Contact the Park and Trail Planning Team for additional information.